Bitwarden vs 1 — The Ultimate Comparison (2025)

If you’re finding it hard to choose between Bitwarden and 1, you’re not alone. Both of them are secure options with a variety of good features. 1’s lack of a free version could make Bitwarden’s strong free plan seem appealing, but how do both managers compare when put side-by-side?

To find out, I tested both Bitwarden and 1 across 15 different areas to find out which is best for organizing all your s. I considered the security features, core management features, device compatibility, ease of use, and value for money.

After my tests, 1 emerged as the undisputed winner, and for many good reasons. It has a better range of features, easily integrates with multiple devices, and is very intuitive. Plus, you can try 1 risk-free using the 14-day free trial to be sure it’s right for you.

Organize your s with 1

No Time? Here’s a 1-Minute Summary of Category Winners

Bitwarden and 1 and top managers on the market, but after testing them both, I found that 1 offers more features and is much easier to use.

Encryption	Uses AES 256-bit encryption to protect your data	Employs AES 256-bit encryption alongside a Secret Key
Two-factor Authentication (2FA)	s TOTP and hardware security keys	Offers TOTP and hardware authentication options
Storage	Unlimited storage, plus 1GB of storage for files	Unlimited storage, plus 1GB for files, and s more item categories
Auto-Save and Fill	Lets you auto-fill and save information, but it is a bit clunky	Auto-fills and saves information on websites conveniently
Generator	Generates secure s and phrases	Creates s, phrases, and PINs to protect your s
Privacy	Adopts an open-source approach and has undergone independent security audits	Uses a proprietary model, but has also undergone several security audits
Auditing	Analyzes the strength and security of your s	Keeps a check on your health and provides a more detailed report
Sharing	Bitwarden allows you to share s with multiple s, but not an entire vault	1 lets you share s with unlimited s and an entire vault
Ease of Use	Easy to use, but the interface is a bit dated in design	Very -friendly and has intuitive interfaces across its apps
Extra Features	Provides only 2 extra features	Offers more extra features compared to Bitwarden
Device Compatibility	Works with Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS devices	s Windows, Linux, Mac, iOS, and Android devices
Customer Service	Offers email, online knowledgebase, and community forums	Provides fast email , rich online knowledgebase, and a very interactive community forum
Price	Priced affordably and costs a few cents monthly	Provides good value but is priced slightly higher
Free Version	Has a decent free version that s unlimited storage	Doesn’t offer a free version
Money-Back Guarantee	Offers a 30-day money-back guarantee	Doesn’t have a money-back guarantee

How I Tested and Compared Bitwarden vs 1

To compare Bitwarden vs. 1 extensively to see if any one of them can match the top managers on the market. I employed the following criteria to come up with a comprehensive comparison:

• Encryption — I evaluated the encryption methods used by Bitwarden and 1 to ensure the security of stored s.
• Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) — I assessed the availability and effectiveness of Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) options in both Bitwarden and 1 for added security.
• Storage — I compared the storage capabilities of Bitwarden and 1, including the capacity to store and organize s.
• Auto-Save and Fill — I tested the auto-save and fill functionality in both Bitwarden and 1 to evaluate their convenience and efficiency in managing s.
• Generator — I examined the generator feature in both applications to assess their ability to create strong and unique s.
• Privacy — I considered the privacy policies and data handling practices of Bitwarden and 1 to ensure information is kept secure.
• Auditing — I checked if both Bitwarden and 1 offer auditing tools to help s identify and update weak or compromised s.
• Sharing — I evaluated the -sharing features in Bitwarden and 1, including the ease of sharing s with trusted individuals or teams.
• Ease of Use — I assessed the ease of use of both Bitwarden and 1, including the interface and overall experience.
• Extra Features — I explored any additional features or functionalities offered by Bitwarden and 1 beyond basic management.
• Device Compatibility — I verified the compatibility of Bitwarden and 1 with various devices and platforms to ensure they meet the ’s needs.
• Customer Service — I tested the responsiveness and helpfulness of the customer service provided by Bitwarden and 1.
• Price — I compared the pricing plans of Bitwarden and 1 to determine their value for money.
• Free Version — I considered the availability and features of free versions if offered by Bitwarden and 1.
• Money-Back Guarantee — I checked whether Bitwarden or 1 provides a money-back guarantee to ensure satisfaction and risk-free trials.

1. Encryption —Both Managers Offer Top-Tier Security, but 1 Goes a Step Further

Bitwarden and 1 prioritize encryption as a fundamental element of their services, with both utilizing military-grade AES 256-bit encryption. However, 1 takes it a step further by providing an additional layer of encryption, making it the winner in this category.

Bitwarden employs end-to-end encryption, meaning your data is encrypted on-device before it reaches its servers. This ensures that Bitwarden cannot access your unencrypted data, enhancing overall security. Additionally, Bitwarden is open-source, allowing the security community to continuously scrutinize and improve its encryption protocols.

On the other hand, 1 also employs robust encryption techniques. They use industry-standard AES-256 encryption to protect your data at rest and in transit. Furthermore, 1 offers an additional layer of security through a Secret Key, which is never transmitted or stored on their servers. This enhances the security of your master .

Your Master is hashed, and the salt undergoes 100,000 iterations of PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256. This robust encryption ensures that even hackers equipped with substantial processing power, attempting millions of guesses, won’t be able to decrypt the data in your 1 vault in the foreseeable future.

While both Bitwarden and 1 prioritize encryption, 1’s robust encryption methods and unique Secret Key add an extra layer of protection that makes it slightly better than Bitdwarden.

2. Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) — Bitwarden and 1 Both Offer an Extra Layer of Security

Bitwarden and 1 both offer multiple two-factor authentication (2FA) options for an additional layer of security. This allows you to further protect the data in your vault, so only you can access it.

Bitwarden seamlessly s Time-based One-Time s (TOTP), integrating with popular authenticator apps such as Authy and Google Authenticator. Alternatively, you can receive your 2FA codes via email. s also have the option to utilize hardware authenticator devices like Duo, YubiKey, and FIDO U2F for added security.

Similarly, 1 also provides robust 2FA options, including TOTP, and it works with authenticator apps such as Google Authenticator, Authy, Okta, and Microsoft Authenticator. If you prefer hardware authentication options, you’ll be pleased to learn that 1 also works with YubiKey, Titan, and Duo Security.

Overall, both Bitwarden and 1 deliver solid 2FA security options to protect your sensitive data. Hence, this category ends in a draw.

3. Storage — 1 Lets You Store More Item Categories

Both managers provide storage capacity for unlimited credentials, but 1 offers the option to store more item categories in its encrypted vault. Bitwarden and 1 both offer 1GB of storage for individual s, but 1 extends it to 5GB for Business s.

1’s vault is a versatile repository capable of securely storing an array of data types. From essential credentials and s to personal notes, medical records, and even sensitive financial information like bank details and software licenses, it covers a broad spectrum of personal and professional data.

Additionally, it accommodates API credentials, port details, databases, email credentials, server access information, crypto private keys, and driver’s license records. Adding new items to your vault is a breeze – simply click the “New Item” button located conveniently at the top-right corner of the desktop app.

Unlike 1, Bitwarden restricts you to storing only 4 types of data in your vault. Specifically, you can save s, credit card information, identity cards, and notes. Some s may see this as restrictive compared to the broader range of data types that other managers can store, especially when comparing it to 1.

One advantage of Bitwarden is that it allows you to self-host your vault, which makes it limitless. However, if you choose to host on Bitwarden’s servers, you can’t files of more than 500MB on a desktop and 100MB from a mobile device.

In summary, Bitwarden and 1 provide unlimited storage to keep all your s. However, given that 1 offers more item categories and larger storage options, it wins in this section.

4. Auto-Save and Fill — 1’s Auto-Fill Function Is More Convenient

Bitwarden and 1 both offer auto-save and auto-fill features for convenient management, but I found 1’s autofill feature to be less clunky compared to Bitwarden. Therefore, 1 excels in this category.

1 offers a convenient auto-save and auto-fill functionality across various web browsers and platforms. It seamlessly captures and populates credentials, credit card details, and personal information, making sure you don’t lose a sweat when g in to any site. While testing the feature, I found it worked seamlessly on my browser and mobile device.

In contrast, Bitwarden’s auto-fill feature didn’t offer the same level of -friendliness as 1’s. Although Bitwarden does provide auto-save and auto-fill capabilities, my experience was less satisfying because it felt outdated and lacked direct integration with website forms.

To utilize Bitwarden’s auto-fill feature, I had to manually click on the web browser extension icon first, which added an extra step to the process.

While both Bitwarden and 1 provide auto-save and auto-fill functions, 1’s convenient browser extensions and apps make it much more intuitive to use compared to Bitwarden. Hence, 1 wins in this category.

5. Generator — 1 Lets You Generate Secure s

Bitwarden and 1 both offer valuable tools to create strong and unique s, but 1 provides more options to choose from. A generator creates strong, random s to enhance security by reducing the risk of unauthorized access to s and sensitive information.

Bitwarden provides a robust generator with customizable options. You can set the length (5 to 128 characters), include special characters, and choose whether to capitalize the words or not. Apart from s, Bitwarden also allows you to generate phrases, which are much easier to and equally secure.

1 also offers a robust generator, with customizable options just like Bitwarden’s, but only that it’s better. You can generate secure random s, phrases, or PINs to protect your s. You can also adjust the lengths of the s (up to 100 characters) and include symbols or numbers.

Overall, 1’s generator ability to generate PINs alongside phrases and s puts it at an advantage over Bitwarden, and as such, it wins in this category. Plus, it is also very customizable and adaptable, making it an ideal choice for those who prioritize control over strength.

6. Privacy — Bitwarden Stands Out for Being Open-Source

Privacy is a critical factor when choosing a manager, and both Bitwarden and 1 take it seriously. Both managers have zero-knowledge models, have been independently audited by third parties like Cure53, and are Type 2 certified. However, I found that Bitwarden is the most privacy-friendly option overall.

Bitwarden stands out for its commitment to open-source software, which means the source code is publicly available and can be scrutinized by the community. This transparency enhances trust, as it allows s to ensure that their data is handled securely. Additionally, Bitwarden offers the option for self-hosting, giving s even more control over their data.

1, on the other hand, relies on a proprietary model, which means the source code is not publicly accessible. However, it has undergone extensive security audits and is known for its robust encryption practices. 1’s security model is trusted by many organizations, including businesses and government agencies.

Both Bitwarden and 1 adhere to strict privacy policies, ensuring that your data remains confidential. However, Bitwarden’s open-source approach and the various third-party audits place it slightly above 1 in of privacy.

7. Auditing — 1’s WatchTower Provides Detailed Analysis

When it comes to auditing, Bitwarden and 1 both offer robust tools to help you identify and improve weak or compromised s, but I found 1’s options to be much easier to use.

Bitwarden provides a health report that analyzes the strength and security of your stored s. It highlights weak, reused, or compromised s, helping s proactively enhance their security. It also integrates with the Have I Been Pwned database to check if your s have been part of any data breaches.

1’s security alert system, known as Watchtower, actively monitors your s. It provides alerts for issues like weak, reused, or compromised s and forthcoming expiration dates for credit cards, driver’s licenses, identity cards, and ports — all while keeping this sensitive data secure on your device.

Furthermore, 1 actively monitors data breaches and notifies you if any of your stored credentials are compromised. It uses the same Have I Been Pwned database, just like Bitwarden, but its reporting is well presented compared to Bitwarden.

While both excel in auditing, 1’s -friendly presentation and comprehensive monitoring make it a standout choice for those seeking an intuitive experience in managing and securing their s. Therefore, 1 wins in this category.

8. Sharing — 1 Allows You to Share s With More People

sharing is a crucial feature for individuals and teams who need to share credentials securely, and both Bitwarden and 1 offer this functionality, albeit with some distinctions. Overall, 1 offers better sharing options than Bitwarden.

Bitwarden simplifies the process of sharing sensitive information with its “Send” feature, enabling you to transmit text data like s, s, notes, or files swiftly, just like sending an email. You can also share folders with Bitwarden’s Organization feature, but the tool is a bit complicated for non-tech-savvy s.

What sets Bitwarden’s Send feature apart is its high degree of customization. You can set viewing limits, add a for access, and set expiry and deletion dates for the shared content. Plus, the recipients don’t need to create a Bitwarden to access these shares.

However, with the free plan, you can only transmit text data; for file sharing, you’d need to subscribe to Bitwarden . While the Send feature is impressive, it would be even more versatile if it allowed for secure folder sharing, which is where 1 shines.

1 has all these customization options that Bitwarden offers but with no limits. For instance, you can share s with multiple s at a time and even share a vault if you’re subscribed to the Family, Teams, or Business plans. It also includes fine-grained permission settings, ensuring that s can control who has access to what s.

In summary, both Bitwarden and 1 provide secure solutions for sharing, but 1’s versatility and extensive sharing options, particularly for multiple s and folder sharing, make it the more comprehensive choice.

9. Ease of Use — 1 Is Very Easy to Use

Both Bitwarden and 1 strive to provide -friendly experiences, but I found 1 to be generally more intuitive and easy to use. The interface is the first experience you’ll have with any app, and that’s the reason it needs to be very appealing.

Bitwarden offers a straightforward and intuitive interface across its web, desktop, and mobile applications, but the interface looks a bit out of style. You can quickly add and organize s, access generators, and navigate settings with ease. However, I noticed that the apps are quite different, with the desktop app being the most feature-rich.

1 offers a -friendly application designed for storing, managing, and safeguarding s. Its intuitive interface presents all features clearly, ensuring easy navigation. Throughout my experience, I encountered no app crashes or delays, highlighting its reliability and smooth operation.

1’s desktop and mobile apps boast -friendly and intuitive interfaces, neatly categorizing features into 4 menus: Favorites, Categories, Tags, and Settings. So, you won’t notice much difference irrespective of the device you’re using. The only downside that I noticed is the time it takes to enter your 34-digit Secret Key when adding a new device.

In of ease of use, 1’s simplicity and -friendliness make it accessible to a broader audience, making it the winner in this category. However, both managers are pretty easy to use.

10. Extra Features — 1 Has More Extra Features

Both Bitwarden and 1 offer extra features, but 1 has more. Bitwarden focuses primarily on core management features. So, you won’t see as many extras as 1 has.

Bitwarden s the following features:

• Self-hosting — offers the option for s to host their data on their servers.
• Secure File Attachments — lets you attach and secure files alongside s.

1, on the other hand, boasts a wider range of extra features. It includes:

• Travel Mode — safeguards sensitive data when traveling by removing it from devices temporarily.
• Privacy Cards (Virtual cards) — generates temporary credit card numbers for secure and anonymous online purchases.
• keys — allow you to create and manage secure cryptographic keys or phrases on ed websites for improved security.

Overall, 1 provides a more comprehensive suite of tools, making it a versatile choice for s seeking additional functionalities beyond basic management.

11. Device Compatibility — Both Managers Work With Popular Devices

Bitwarden and 1 both offer wide device compatibility, ensuring s can access their s and secure data across various platforms.

Bitwarden is known for its excellent cross-platform . It works with the following devices and browsers:

• Windows (10 and 11)
• macOS (10.14 or later)
• Linux (Ubuntu, Debian, Linux Mint, Fedora, CentOS, RHEL, OpenSUSE, etc.)
• iOS (11.0 or later)
• Android (5.0 or later)
• Browser extension (Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Opera, Tor Browser, Vivaldi, Brave, and Safari)
• Command Line (for advanced s on various platforms)

Similarly, 1 provides robust device compatibility. It covers most major platforms, ensuring s can seamlessly access their s regardless of the device they use. The ed platforms are:

• Windows (11 64-bit or Windows 10 64-bit)
• macOS (10.15 or later)
• iOS (15.5 or newer)
• Android (Android 9.0 or later)
• Linux (Ubuntu, Debian, Linux Mint, Fedora, CentOS, RHEL, openSUSE distributions).
• Browser extension (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Brave)
• Command Line (for advanced s on various platforms)

In of device compatibility, both Bitwarden and 1 perform irably, offering widespread across desktop, mobile, and browser environments. Hence, this round ends in a draw.

12. Customer Service — 1’s Community Forum Stands Out

Both Bitwarden and 1 offer excellent customer options, primarily via email, community forums, and online knowledgebase. Customer service plays a crucial role in any software or service, and I was impressed with the quality of offered by both managers.

I reached out to Bitwarden’s customer via email to inquire about the security measures concerning its vault in the event of a potential hack. Within 2 hours, I received a comprehensive response containing valuable information that effectively alleviated my concerns. They also have a rich online knowledge base and community forum.

1 also provides prompt email . I sent a few inquiries to their email regarding their anti-keylogging feature, and to my satisfaction, I received a response in under 3 hours. The reply addressed all of my concerns comprehensively and provided guidance to protect against keylogging threats.

Furthermore, you can engage 1’s community forum, which boasts an extensive database of over 250,000 questions and receives around 100 or more responses daily. When I posted a question there, I received a response in under 4 hours, showcasing the community’s active engagement. There’s also a Twitter handle with equally prompt and valuable responses.

Overall, both Bitwarden and 1 deliver impressive customer options, ensuring s can find assistance and answers to their queries effectively. However, given that 1 offers more options and a very commendable community forum, it takes the lead in this category.

13. Price — Bitwarden Offers Cheaper Plans

In the Bitwarden vs. 1 price comparison, both managers offer various pricing tiers to cater to different needs and budgets. However, Bitwarden has a notable advantage when it comes to affordability.

Bitwarden’s pricing options are as follows:

• Free Version — Bitwarden offers a fully functional free version with essential features like unlimited storage, generation, and secure notes.
• Plan — Bitwarden’s plan is priced at a very affordable rate. This subscription unlocks additional features like two-factor authentication (2FA) with hardware security keys, secure file storage, and priority customer .
• Family Plan — Bitwarden’s family plan allows you to share features with up to 5 family for a slightly higher annual fee, making it a cost-effective choice for households.

In the same way, 1’s pricing options are as follows:

• No Free Version — Unlike Bitwarden, 1 does not offer a free version. s are required to subscribe to one of their plans.
• Personal Plan — This individual subscription for 1. It includes features like storage, 2FA, and secure document storage. I recommend this plan for the wider range of features it provides compared to Bitwarden.
• Family Plan — 1’s family plan is designed for sharing with up to 5 family and slightly costs more than Bitwarden’s family plan, making it a higher-priced option for families.

Overall, Bitwarden stands out for its affordability, especially with its free and reasonably priced plans. In contrast, 1’s pricing can be steeper, particularly for individuals and families.

14. Free Version — Only Bitwarden Has a Free Version

In the showdown between Bitwarden and 1’s free versions, there’s a clear victor – Bitwarden. Bitwarden offers a feature-rich, no-cost option that stands out in the realm of managers.

Bitwarden’s free version allows s to enjoy many essential features. You get unlimited storage, secure generation, and access to your s across various devices. It also s two-factor authentication (2FA), ensuring an added layer of security.

In contrast, 1 does not offer a free version, requiring s to commit to a subscription from the get-go. While 1 boasts impressive features, the absence of a free option might deter budget-conscious s or those simply looking to dip their toes into management.

Bitwarden’s commitment to offering a robust free version makes it an attractive choice for individuals and small businesses seeking effective management without breaking the bank. In this category, Bitwarden takes the lead.

15. Money-Back Guarantee — Bitwarden Offers a Generous 30-Day Money-Back Guarantee

When it comes to money-back guarantees, Bitwarden takes the lead as 1 only offers a 14-day free trial.

Bitwarden provides a generous 30-day money-back guarantee for its subscription plans. If you’re unsatisfied with the service within the first month of subscribing, you can request a refund. Bitwarden’s straightforward refund policy demonstrates its commitment to customer satisfaction.

On the other hand, 1 does not offer a money-back guarantee for its subscription plans. Once you commit to a subscription, you won’t be eligible for a refund, regardless of your satisfaction level. This lack of a money-back guarantee might be a drawback for s who are uncertain about their long-term commitment.

In this category, Bitwarden has the upper hand by providing a risk-free trial period for its plans. It allows s to test the service and ensure it meets their needs without the financial risk associated with 1’s no-refund policy. Therefore, Bitwarden’s money-back guarantee policy is more favorable for potential subscribers.

And the Winner Is… 1

Bitwarden and 1 are 2 well-known managers with solid features, but after testing both of them extensively, I concluded that 1 is the undisputed winner. It was a tough contest, but 1 proved better in its security offerings, management features, and -friendliness.

• Encryption — 1
• Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) — Tie
• Storage — 1
• Auto-Save and Fill — 1
• Generator — 1
• Privacy — Bitwarden
• Auditing — 1
• Sharing — 1
• Ease of Use — 1
• Extra Features — 1
• Device Compatibility — Tie
• Customer Service — 1
• Price — Bitwarden
• Free Version — Bitwarden
• Money-Back Guarantee — Bitwarden

Bitwarden is also a good option, excelling due to its open-source nature, affordability, and privacy features. It serves as a decent manager if you’re on a budget. However, it’s the superior choice, given 1’s better range of features, ease of use, and excellent customer service.

1 was a delight to use. It helped me organize all my credentials securely, generate strong s, and auto-fill websites seamlessly. You can try 1 risk-free using the 14-day free trial.

How to Install 1 on Your Device

Unlike many managers that rely on browser extensions for desktops, 1 has an app for Windows devices. You can it in a few minutes by following the steps below:

FAQs About Bitwarden vs 1

---

Summary — The Overall Best Managers in 2025